mirror of
https://github.com/krahets/hello-algo.git
synced 2024-12-26 02:26:28 +08:00
165 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
165 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
|
# Array representation of binary trees
|
||
|
|
||
|
Under the linked list representation, the storage unit of a binary tree is a node `TreeNode`, with nodes connected by pointers. The basic operations of binary trees under the linked list representation were introduced in the previous section.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So, can we use an array to represent a binary tree? The answer is yes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Representing perfect binary trees
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's analyze a simple case first. Given a perfect binary tree, we store all nodes in an array according to the order of level-order traversal, where each node corresponds to a unique array index.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Based on the characteristics of level-order traversal, we can deduce a "mapping formula" between the index of a parent node and its children: **If a node's index is $i$, then the index of its left child is $2i + 1$ and the right child is $2i + 2$**. The figure below shows the mapping relationship between the indices of various nodes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Array representation of a perfect binary tree](array_representation_of_tree.assets/array_representation_binary_tree.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
**The mapping formula plays a role similar to the node references (pointers) in linked lists**. Given any node in the array, we can access its left (right) child node using the mapping formula.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Representing any binary tree
|
||
|
|
||
|
Perfect binary trees are a special case; there are often many `None` values in the middle levels of a binary tree. Since the sequence of level-order traversal does not include these `None` values, we cannot solely rely on this sequence to deduce the number and distribution of `None` values. **This means that multiple binary tree structures can match the same level-order traversal sequence**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As shown in the figure below, given a non-perfect binary tree, the above method of array representation fails.
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Level-order traversal sequence corresponds to multiple binary tree possibilities](array_representation_of_tree.assets/array_representation_without_empty.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
To solve this problem, **we can consider explicitly writing out all `None` values in the level-order traversal sequence**. As shown in the following figure, after this treatment, the level-order traversal sequence can uniquely represent a binary tree. Example code is as follows:
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Python"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```python title=""
|
||
|
# Array representation of a binary tree
|
||
|
# Using None to represent empty slots
|
||
|
tree = [1, 2, 3, 4, None, 6, 7, 8, 9, None, None, 12, None, None, 15]
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "C++"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```cpp title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using the maximum integer value INT_MAX to mark empty slots
|
||
|
vector<int> tree = {1, 2, 3, 4, INT_MAX, 6, 7, 8, 9, INT_MAX, INT_MAX, 12, INT_MAX, INT_MAX, 15};
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Java"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```java title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using the Integer wrapper class allows for using null to mark empty slots
|
||
|
Integer[] tree = { 1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15 };
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "C#"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```csharp title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using nullable int (int?) allows for using null to mark empty slots
|
||
|
int?[] tree = [1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15];
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Go"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```go title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using an any type slice, allowing for nil to mark empty slots
|
||
|
tree := []any{1, 2, 3, 4, nil, 6, 7, 8, 9, nil, nil, 12, nil, nil, 15}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Swift"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```swift title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using optional Int (Int?) allows for using nil to mark empty slots
|
||
|
let tree: [Int?] = [1, 2, 3, 4, nil, 6, 7, 8, 9, nil, nil, 12, nil, nil, 15]
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "JS"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```javascript title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using null to represent empty slots
|
||
|
let tree = [1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15];
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "TS"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using null to represent empty slots
|
||
|
let tree: (number | null)[] = [1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15];
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Dart"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```dart title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using nullable int (int?) allows for using null to mark empty slots
|
||
|
List<int?> tree = [1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15];
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Rust"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```rust title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using None to mark empty slots
|
||
|
let tree = [Some(1), Some(2), Some(3), Some(4), None, Some(6), Some(7), Some(8), Some(9), None, None, Some(12), None, None, Some(15)];
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "C"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```c title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using the maximum int value to mark empty slots, therefore, node values must not be INT_MAX
|
||
|
int tree[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, INT_MAX, 6, 7, 8, 9, INT_MAX, INT_MAX, 12, INT_MAX, INT_MAX, 15};
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Kotlin"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```kotlin title=""
|
||
|
/* Array representation of a binary tree */
|
||
|
// Using null to represent empty slots
|
||
|
val tree = mutableListOf( 1, 2, 3, 4, null, 6, 7, 8, 9, null, null, 12, null, null, 15 )
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Ruby"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```ruby title=""
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
=== "Zig"
|
||
|
|
||
|
```zig title=""
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Array representation of any type of binary tree](array_representation_of_tree.assets/array_representation_with_empty.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's worth noting that **complete binary trees are very suitable for array representation**. Recalling the definition of a complete binary tree, `None` appears only at the bottom level and towards the right, **meaning all `None` values definitely appear at the end of the level-order traversal sequence**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This means that when using an array to represent a complete binary tree, it's possible to omit storing all `None` values, which is very convenient. The figure below gives an example.
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Array representation of a complete binary tree](array_representation_of_tree.assets/array_representation_complete_binary_tree.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following code implements a binary tree based on array representation, including the following operations:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Given a node, obtain its value, left (right) child node, and parent node.
|
||
|
- Obtain the preorder, inorder, postorder, and level-order traversal sequences.
|
||
|
|
||
|
```src
|
||
|
[file]{array_binary_tree}-[class]{array_binary_tree}-[func]{}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Advantages and limitations
|
||
|
|
||
|
The array representation of binary trees has the following advantages:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Arrays are stored in contiguous memory spaces, which is cache-friendly and allows for faster access and traversal.
|
||
|
- It does not require storing pointers, which saves space.
|
||
|
- It allows random access to nodes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, the array representation also has some limitations:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Array storage requires contiguous memory space, so it is not suitable for storing trees with a large amount of data.
|
||
|
- Adding or deleting nodes requires array insertion and deletion operations, which are less efficient.
|
||
|
- When there are many `None` values in the binary tree, the proportion of node data contained in the array is low, leading to lower space utilization.
|